Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process

dc.contributor.authorWinowiecki, Leigh Ann
dc.contributor.authorBourne, Mieke
dc.contributor.authorMagaju, Christine
dc.contributor.authorNeely, Constance
dc.contributor.authorMassawe, Boniface
dc.contributor.authorMasikati, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorVågen, Tor-Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorMusili, Faith
dc.contributor.authorNabi, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorNguyo, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorSeid, Hadia
dc.contributor.authorHadgu, Kiros
dc.contributor.authorShoo, Aikande
dc.contributor.authorTembo, Howard
dc.contributor.authorChipatela, Floyd
dc.contributor.authorChesterman, Sabrina
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Karl
dc.contributor.authorTemu, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorKimaro, Anthony Anderson
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, Fergus
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T11:33:54Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T11:33:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionJournal articleen_US
dc.description.abstractSustainable agricultural intensification (SAI) has the potential to increase food security without detrimental effects on ecosystem services. However, adoption of SAI practices across sub-Saharan Africa has not reached transformational numbers to date. It is often hampered by lack of context-specific practices, sub-optimal understanding of tradeoffs and synergies among stakeholders, and lack of approaches that bring diverse evidence sources together with stakeholders to collectively tackle complex problems. In this study, we asked three interconnected questions: (i) What is the accessibility and use of evidence for SAI decision making; (ii) What tools could enhance access and interaction with evidence for tradeoff analysis; and (iii) Which stakeholders must be included? This study employed a range of research and engagement methods including surveys, stakeholder analysis, participatory trade-off assessments and co-design of decision dashboards to better support evidence-based decision making in Zambia, Tanzania and Ethiopia. At the inception, SAI evidence was accessible and used by less than half of the decision makers across the three countries and online dashboards hold promise to enhance access. Many of the stakeholders working on SAI were not collaborating and tradeoff analysis was an under-utilized tool. Structured engagement across multiple stakeholder groups with evidence is critical.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLeigh Ann Winowiecki, Mieke Bourne, Christine Magaju, Constance Neely, Boniface Massawe, Patricia Masikati, Tor-Gunnar Vågen, Faith Musili, Muhammad Nabi, Anthony Nguyo, Hadia Seid, Kiros Hadgu, Aikande Shoo, Howard Tembo, Floyd Chipatela, Sabrina Chesterman, Karl Hughes, Emmanuel Temu, Anthony Anderson Kimaro & Fergus Sinclair (2021): Bringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement process, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2021.1897297en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/3635
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectSustainable agriculturalen_US
dc.subjectIntensificationen_US
dc.subjectStakeholderen_US
dc.subjectEngagementen_US
dc.subjectSHAREDen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based decisionen_US
dc.subjectMakingen_US
dc.subjectTradeoff analysisen_US
dc.titleBringing evidence to bear for negotiating tradeoffs in sustainable agricultural intensification using a structured stakeholder engagement processen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1897297en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Winowiecki et al _ Massawe 2021 - Bringing evidence to bear.pdf
Size:
2.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.67 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: